Who should choose Pixelmator?

Teams that want fast image editor for mac

Who should choose Krita?

Teams that want open-source digital painting

Software comparison - Design Tools

Pixelmator vs Krita: 2026 Comparison

Pixelmator and Krita are both capable image editors but serve different audiences. Pixelmator is Mac-only, optimized for speed, and integrates with macOS; Krita is cross-platform, open-source, and built for digital painting and illustration. Pick Pixelmator for fast photo editing; pick Krita if you do concept art or need portability. [see other design tools](/tools)

Comparison dimensions

Dimension	Pixelmator	Krita	Winner
Design Features	7/10Pixelmator offers strong layer support, blend modes, and smart selection tools; great for retouching and photo compositing; lacks the advanced brush engine of Krita.	7/10Krita's brush engine is its crown jewel: 100+ customizable brushes, textured strokes, and particle systems designed for digital painting and concept art.	Tie
Collaboration	9/10Pixelmator is Mac-native and includes cloud collaboration via Pixelmator Cloud; real-time shared editing is smooth and responsive.	7/10Krita's collaboration is limited: no real-time sync; community-built plugins exist but are unreliable; best for solo work or asynchronous feedback.	Pixelmator
Prototyping	9/10Pixelmator excels at UI mockups and rapid iterations; vector shapes, smart objects, and responsive canvas make prototyping fast.	7/10Krita's prototyping is weaker; it's optimized for raster work. Designers often use Figma for wireframes and Krita for detailed visual assets.	Pixelmator
Pricing	8/10Pixelmator pricing is $39.99 one-time for Pro on Mac; no subscription required; Pixelmator Cloud adds optional $4.99/month.	8/10Krita is free and open-source; optional Gumroad supporters pay what they want; lowest cost for budget-conscious creators.	Tie
Plugins	9/10Pixelmator's plugin ecosystem is small; most functionality is built-in; Mac App Store integration is tight.	7/10Krita has a growing Python plugin ecosystem; scripts can extend brushes, workflows, and filters; community-authored tools are increasingly powerful.	Pixelmator
Performance	8/10Pixelmator is optimized for speed on modern Macs; rarely lags even with large canvases; memory footprint is lean.	8/10Krita is responsive on modern hardware; scales well to 4K+ workspaces; performance on older machines or Linux can be sluggish.	Tie

Design Features

Pixelmator: Pixelmator offers strong layer support, blend modes, and smart selection tools; great for retouching and photo compositing; lacks the advanced brush engine of Krita.

Krita: Krita's brush engine is its crown jewel: 100+ customizable brushes, textured strokes, and particle systems designed for digital painting and concept art.

Collaboration

Pixelmator: Pixelmator is Mac-native and includes cloud collaboration via Pixelmator Cloud; real-time shared editing is smooth and responsive.

Krita: Krita's collaboration is limited: no real-time sync; community-built plugins exist but are unreliable; best for solo work or asynchronous feedback.

Prototyping

Pixelmator: Pixelmator excels at UI mockups and rapid iterations; vector shapes, smart objects, and responsive canvas make prototyping fast.

Krita: Krita's prototyping is weaker; it's optimized for raster work. Designers often use Figma for wireframes and Krita for detailed visual assets.

Pricing

Pixelmator: Pixelmator pricing is $39.99 one-time for Pro on Mac; no subscription required; Pixelmator Cloud adds optional $4.99/month.

Krita: Krita is free and open-source; optional Gumroad supporters pay what they want; lowest cost for budget-conscious creators.

Plugins

Pixelmator: Pixelmator's plugin ecosystem is small; most functionality is built-in; Mac App Store integration is tight.

Krita: Krita has a growing Python plugin ecosystem; scripts can extend brushes, workflows, and filters; community-authored tools are increasingly powerful.

Performance

Pixelmator: Pixelmator is optimized for speed on modern Macs; rarely lags even with large canvases; memory footprint is lean.

Krita: Krita is responsive on modern hardware; scales well to 4K+ workspaces; performance on older machines or Linux can be sluggish.

Best for Pixelmator

Teams that want fast image editor for mac
Users prioritizing design features
Growth-stage teams

Best for Krita

Teams that want open-source digital painting
Users prioritizing design features
Budget-conscious teams

Decision notes

Try Pixelmator if you're on Mac and value UI polish and speed; try Krita if you paint, sketch, or work on Linux/Windows. Most digital artists pick within a week of hands-on use.

Export/import support between Pixelmator and Krita
Team onboarding and learning curve
Pricing at your seat count
Integration coverage for your stack

Frequently asked questions

More research

Keep comparing before you commit

All comparisons Browse alternatives